by Catriona Troth
One chilling image marked the entrance to the exhibition, Propaganda, Power and Persuasion, this
summer at the British Library.
Arriving at the exhibition through a comparatively narrow
corridor, you were met by two lines of mannequins covered in black fabric. On
their chests were quotations about propaganda, and on their arms, the author of
those quotations. Each was set up so that you read the quotation first and then
had to take another step before you could see who had said it.
If you stood for a while in that entrance space, you would
see one person after another stop and smile at one particular quotation:
It may be a good thing to possess power that rests in arms. But it is
better and more lasting to win the hearts of people and to keep it.
Then they would take another step, read the name on the
mannequin’s arm, and their faces would freeze.
The author was Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s chief of propaganda.
For an author interested in writing fiction that confronts
serious issues, the fear of turning a story into a polemic is never far away.
So, for me, the opportunity to take a long hard, literary look at what
constitutes propaganda was irresistible.
The word itself goes back to Congregatio de Propaganda Fide, or the Congregation for the
Propagation of the Faith – an office of the medieval Roman Catholic Church. In
Latin, it essentially means ‘to spread the word’. But propaganda has been around
as long as there have been those in power or authority wishing to deliver a
message. What has changed is the speed and scale of dissemination that became
possible – from the invention of the printing press, to newspapers, radio, and
finally in the latter half of the 20th Century, to the ubiquity of
television.
We probably associate propaganda most with times of war, and
there were extensive examples of this – from Norman Rockwell posters to
Japanese cartoons to a set of the infamous Iraq War playing cards of 2003.
One exhibit brought back a sudden flash of memory: Ian
McDonald, spokesman for the Ministry of Defence during the Falklands War,
delivering the night’s portion of statistics in a voice devoid of emotion. It
struck me that this was probably one of the last times that a democratic
government had the ability to control information about the progress of a war
in this way. By the time the Gulf Wars
came along, we had 24 hour news and journalists embedded with troops. And in
the last few years there has been another quantum change – with news from
within conflict zones being provided minute by minute, from civilians on the
ground via video phones and Twitter. I am not sure if this means that we get
any closer to the truth of a situation, but it has robbed governments of the
ability to control what we are told and when.
Just why it is so important that the power to control
information should not rest in any one set of hands, is amply illustrated in
the most disturbing section of all – the creation of The Enemy.
Unsurprisingly, this section had plenty of examples of the
long campaign of scapegoating and playing to pre-existing prejudices that
allowed the Nazis ultimately to turn the entire Jewish population of Europe
into non-humans in the minds of ordinary people. But it also showed how the earlier,
discredited campaign to vilify Germans during the First World War led people to
dismiss rumours about concentration camps during the Second.
And lest we think that attempts at such crude propaganda are
a thing of the past, you only had to turn a corner to find a video of George W
Bush’s Axis of Evil speech at the UN.
If this section included the most disturbing images of the
exhibition, it also provided one of its more amusing moments. A Soviet poster
from the Cold War showed a cartoon of the Statue of Liberty, with the eyes
transformed into spy holes through which New York City policemen spied on their
fellow citizens. The irony was that the Soviet Secret Police were surely the
more guilty of ruthlessly spying on their own citizens. And yet, and yet... with
the recent revelation by Edward Snowdon about the spying activities of the
American government, you have to wonder how far off the mark the original
poster was. I wonder if the BL curators
were aware of this new patina of irony when they assembled the exhibition?
The exhibition also reminded us that propaganda can also be
used to carry relatively benign messages.
Public Health, for instance (examples here included both the heavy-handed
posters and videos from the early AIDS Awareness campaigns (‘Don’t Die of
Ignorance’) to the more subtle Change4Life cartoons, currently being used to
promote healthy eating. Or positive messages that create a sense of nationhood
– like Danny Boyle’s opening ceremony for the 2012 Olympics, which was
extensively analysed.
Here again, the impact of social media was examined – in
this case the ‘ripple effect’ of Twitter on the way people responded to the
Olympic Ceremony. A big screen showed
how the tone of tweets changed over time, from primarily cynical at the start
to overwhelmingly positive by the end of the ceremony, so that Twitter itself
became an opinion maker.
But just as the old forms of propaganda had their invidious
sides, so does social media. It allows ordinary people to tell the world what
is happening in places like Burma or Tahrir Square, unmediated by monolithic
dictatorships. But it also allows
anonymous voices to defame or make threats without redress. And it contains within itself the possibility
of mob rule. It’s a beast that, as the 21st Century progresses, we
will have to learn how to harness, use and guard against.
So at the end of all that, what had I learnt about avoiding
turning fiction that addresses an issue into propaganda? Well, it was mostly
common sense:
- Don’t let the message get in the way of telling a good story
- Give both sides of the argument a human face
- Let your readers make up their own minds.
Catriona Troth’s forthcoming novel, Ghost Town, is set in 1981, against the background of violent clashes between skinhead and Asian youths in Coventry.